The formation of Malaysia was not a simple merger; it was a high-stakes international treaty known as the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63). However, a series of legislative maneuvers and procedural anomalies have led many to question the very foundation of the Federation. Central to this debate is the Territorial Sea Act 2012 (TSA 2012) and the controversial registration of MA63 with the United Nations.
阅读全文: The Legal Mirage: Why TSA 2012 and the 1970 UN Registration Threaten Sarawak’s Sovereignty
Borneo’s Plight in Malaysia Foundation (BoPiMaFo) expresses deep concern over the recent remarks by the Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department (Sabah and Sarawak Affairs), Datuk Ts Mustapha Sakmud, who highlighted the billions spent by the Federal Government on petrol and diesel subsidies as evidence of Putrajaya’s commitment to protecting Malaysians from rising global oil prices.
Recently, due to my health flashing a red light, I have been hospitalized at Sibu Central Hospital for many days. This is my longest stay at the hospital. Being present, witnessing the reality firsthand, as a patient, I deeply feel: the expansion of Sibu Central Hospital can no longer be delayed.
阅读全文: Yu Chin Liik: Sibu Central Hospital Expansion Cannot Wait Any Longer—Ward Bathroom Problems...
阅读全文: Kenyataan Parti Bumi Kenyalang (PBK): Seruan Perpaduan Melampaui Politik Perkauman
阅读全文: Statement by Parti Bumi Kenyalang (PBK): A Call for Unity Beyond Racial Politics
Sarawak bukan tanah jajahan. Sarawak bukan wilayah bawahan. Sarawak adalah rakan kongsi pengasas yang setara dalam Malaysia di bawah MA63. Hari ini, kerajaan GPS telah membawa cabaran di hadapan Mahkamah Persekutuan mengenai perlembagaan *Akta Pembangunan Petroleum 1974 (PDA 1974)* dan *Akta Pelantar Benua 1966 (CSA 1966)* — dua undang-undang persekutuan yang melucutkan kawalan Sarawak ke atas sumber minyak dan gasnya sendiri.
阅读全文: Masa Depan Sarawak: PBK Gesa Pemansuhan, Bukan Sekadar Litigasi, Untuk Kawalan Sumber
Sarawak is not a colony. Sarawak is not a subordinate territory. Sarawak is an equal founding partner in Malaysia under MA63. Today, the GPS government has brought before the Federal Court a challenge concerning the constitutionality of the *Petroleum Development Act 1974 (PDA 1974)* and the *Continental Shelf Act 1966 (CSA 1966)* — two federal laws that stripped Sarawak of control over its own oil and gas resources.
阅读全文: Economic Justice for Sarawak: PBK on the Fight for Oil and Gas Sovereignty
Sarawak is rich in natural resources. Yet many of our rural communities still live in poverty without proper roads, sanitation, clean water, or stable income. This is unacceptable. Parti Bumi Kenyalang calls for the immediate establishment of a *Sarawak Poverty Alleviation Political Action Team* — a disciplined, full-time task force stationed directly in rural villages.
Pertikaian mahkamah yang berterusan antara kerajaan GPS Sarawak dan PETRONAS telah secara serius meruntuhkan kredibiliti, autoriti, dan kuasa rundingan kerajaan GPS dalam berurusan dengan Kerajaan Persekutuan dan PETRONAS. Konfrontasi undang-undang ini telah mendedahkan kelemahan GPS dan ketidakupayaannya untuk secara tegas melindungi hak dan kepentingan Sarawak ke atas sumber minyak dan gasnya sendiri.
阅读全文: Pertikaian GPS-PETRONAS: Sarawak Desak Pengembalian Hak Minyak dan Gas
The ongoing court dispute between the Sarawak GPS government and PETRONAS has severely undermined the credibility, authority, and bargaining power of the GPS government in dealing with the Federal Government and PETRONAS. This legal confrontation has exposed the weakness of GPS and its inability to decisively protect Sarawak’s rights and interests over its own oil and gas resources.
阅读全文: Repeal PDA 74: Reclaiming Sarawak’s Sovereign Rights Over Its Natural Resources
Terdapat kepercayaan umum bahawa dalam keadaan darurat, seseorang dibenarkan melakukan apa yang biasanya dilarang. Konsep ini, yang tertanam dalam banyak sistem perundangan dan moral, membenarkan penggantungan sementara peraturan biasa dan pelaksanaan kuasa luar biasa untuk mengurus krisis. Walau bagaimanapun, kata kunci kritikal di sini ialah sementara.
阅读全文: Darurat Yang Tidak Pernah Berakhir: Bagaimana Kuasa Sementara Membentuk Realiti Kekal
阅读全文: The Emergency That Never Ended: How Temporary Powers Shaped Permanent Realities
Dalam wacana baru-baru ini, Menteri Undang-Undang dan Reformasi Institusi, Datu Sri Azalina Osman Syed, menyatakan di parlimen bahawa Perjanjian Malaysia 1963 (MA63) tidak mengandungi sebarang sebutan eksplisit mengenai pemilikan atau peraturan minyak dan gas, membayangkan bahawa sumber-sumber ini secara automatik berada di bawah kawalan kerajaan persekutuan dan, seterusnya, Petronas. Penegasan ini, walaupun kelihatan mudah, telah disambut dengan bantahan keras, menonjolkan satu peninggalan kritikal dalam memahami prinsip-prinsip asas pembentukan Malaysia.
阅读全文: Membongkar MA63: Urusan Belum Selesai Pembentukan Malaysia
In a recent discourse, the Law and Institutional Reform Minister, Datu Sri Azalina Osman Syed, stated in parliament that the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) contains no explicit mention of oil and gas ownership or regulation, implying that these resources automatically fall under federal government control and, by extension, Petronas. This assertion, while seemingly straightforward, has been met with strong rebuttal, highlighting a critical omission in understanding the foundational principles of Malaysia's formation.
阅读全文: Unpacking MA63: The Unfinished Business of Malaysia's Formation
Sejarah menunjukkan bahawa kesatuan politik hanya akan kekal bertahan apabila ia didasarkan atas rasa hormat, keadilan, dan niat yang ikhlas. Pemisahan Singapura daripada Malaysia pada tahun 1965 berlaku susulan perselisihan politik dan ekonomi yang berlarutan, yang tidak dapat diselesaikan meskipun pelbagai usaha penyelesaian telah dilakukan.
阅读全文: PBK: Jika Hormat Tiada, Teladani Model Perpisahan Singapura 1965 demi Kedamaian
Pertikaian mahkamah yang sedang berlarutan antara kerajaan GPS Sarawak dan PETRONAS telah menjejaskan kredibiliti, kewibawaan, dan kuasa tawar-menawar kerajaan GPS dalam berurusan dengan Kerajaan Persekutuan serta PETRONAS. Konfrontasi undang-undang ini telah mendedahkan kelemahan GPS dan ketidakupayaan mereka untuk melindungi hak dan kepentingan Sarawak secara tegas ke atas sumber minyak dan gas milik sendiri.
阅读全文: PBK: Kerajaan GPS Lemah, Kekayaan Minyak Sarawak Menjadi Mangsa "Rompakan Politik"
The ongoing court dispute between the Sarawak GPS government and PETRONAS has severely undermined the credibility, authority, and bargaining power of the GPS government in dealing with the Federal Government and PETRONAS. This legal confrontation has exposed the weakness of GPS and its inability to decisively protect Sarawak’s rights and interests over its own oil and gas resources.
阅读全文: PBK: GPS Must Act on Sarawak’s Oil Sovereignty or Step Aside
Current debates over the recognition of the Unified Examination Certificate (UEC) are often oversimplified into technicalities: Is the UEC equivalent to a national diploma? Should students take SPM Malay and History? However, detached from its historical context, the question itself is flawed. The UEC was not a "capricious choice" by the Chinese community; it was a self-preservation mechanism forced into existence by a systemic rupture.
阅读全文: Beyond Recognition: The UEC as a Bastion of Dignity, Not Just a Diploma