Malaysia Agreement 1963 is supposed to sign Sabah, Singapore, Sarawak and federation of Malaya into a new country called Malaysia. Malaysian believe that is fact .
However, the record in United Nation shows there's never a new country called Malaysia being registered. However, there was Federation of Malaya had a change of name from Malaya to Malaysia. Another evidence of Malaysia is just a change of name of federation of Malaya from Malaya to Malaysia is at the soul of Malaysia, the federal constitution which based purely on Federation of Malaya 1957 which has nothing to do with Sabah, Sarawak nor Singapore, without taking into consideration of the foundation of "Malaysia Formation", Malaysia Agreement 1963. If there's any amendments of federal constitution needed, the contents of Malaysia Agreement 1963 should be incorporated into Malaysia constitution or else Formation of Malaysia has never begun or Malaysia is basically an evidence of both Sabah and Sarawak being colonised by Federation of Malaya.
Further delay in recognition of Malaysia Agreement 1963 will be perceived internationally and notionally as treating Sabah and Sarawak as colonies all this while, taking natural resources freely from Sabah and Sarawak without taking good care of the people there. #WSJ
1963年的马来西亚协议应该将沙巴，新加坡，沙捞越和马来亚联邦签署为一个名为马来西亚的新国家。马来西亚人认为这是事实。
然而，联合国的记录显示，从来没有一个名为马来西亚的新国家被登记。然而，有马来亚联邦改名为马来亚到马来西亚。马来西亚的另一个证据就是改变马来亚从马来亚到马来西亚的联邦名称是马来西亚的灵魂，联邦宪法完全基于1957年的马来亚联邦，与沙巴，沙捞越和新加坡没有任何关系，没有采取考虑到“马来西亚组建”的基础，马来西亚协议1963年。如果需要修改联邦宪法，马来西亚1963年马来西亚协议的内容应纳入马来西亚宪法，否则马来西亚的形成从未开始或马来西亚基本上是证据沙巴和沙捞越被马来亚联邦殖民。
进一步推迟承认1963年“马来西亚协定”将被视为国际和理论上将沙巴和沙捞越视为殖民地，同时从沙巴和沙捞越自由获取自然资源而不照顾那里的人民。 ＃
